INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE: Earlier studies on compliance and orthodontics have shown that one of the best ways to increase compliance is by supervising the wearing time. Compliance can also be increased by reminding the patient to use the removable appliance. This pilot study aims to investigate if any of two kinds of reminders objectively increase the compliance during orthodontic treatment with removable appliances or not. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 18 patients between 9-14 years of age were selected from a patient population attending the department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University. They presented different types of malocclusion which made them candidates for treatment with either van Beek-appliances or expansion plate. The patients were randomly placed in one of three groups; alarm, calendar or control group. Wearing time was objectively collected from the TheraMon®-module placed inside the acrylic base of the appliances. After the data collecting-phase was finished the data was tested with Anova and t-test to determine whether there was a significant difference between the groups. RESULTS: The alarm group had the highest average wear time. The control group had slightly lower average wear time than the alarm group, and the calendar group had the least amount of average wear time. There was a difference in average wear time between van Beek and expansion plate, with van Beek having a lower average wear time than expansion plate. Patients treated with expansion plates were more cooperative than patients treated with van Beek appliances. When data was tested for significance, no statistical significance was found. CONCLUSION: The study concludes that an alarm type of reminder appears to be better at improving wear time than a calendar or no reminder at all. This indicates that for future studies there might be a reason to develop a reminder for patients, for example an app. The study concludes that patients with expansion plates appear more cooperative than patients using van Beek appliance, so therefore focus should be on improving cooperation for patients using these types of appliances. This study shows that future studies should use one type of appliance, e.g. van Beek. More patients are needed in future studies to achieve statistical significant results.